If Walmart offers $9 per hour to stock shelves while the government offers $10 to watch TV at home, where is the incentive to work?
by Brian Maher of Daily Reckoning
Alice in Wonderland’s White Queen believed six impossible things before breakfast.
Today’s guardians of opinion demand we believe a six more… and another dozen by lunch.
That the mainstream news is precisely and invariably accurate, for example.
That deficits do not matter.
Or that a man offered $15 an hour to loaf will decline it for a job that only pays him $10.
Thus we arrive at the glittering gem of universal basic income, or “UBI.”
UBI is an idea gaining traction among those given to believing impossible things — college professors.
The fellow with stars in his eyes… is often the fellow with rocks in his head.
Under UBI, the government would guarantee every working-age American a basic standard of living.
No string would come attached to this pretty peach… no proof of want… no questions whatsoever.
Assume, for example, that a strong-backed fellow can find employment moving furniture.
But the job demands an early rise… and he finds that dozing until noon better suits him.
Would this layabout receive a check?
Yes he would.
A gal has services to offer her local Walmart, which maintains an advertised need for these services.
But she concludes the job would make impossible demands of her leisure.
So she lets it pass by.
Would she receive her universal basic income?
And who could blame her?
If Walmart offers her $9 per hour to stock its shelves — while the government offers $10 to gawk soap operas from her lazy couch— where is her incentive to stock shelves?
Between 1968 and 1980, six U.S. states test-ran various UBI schemes.
The results, according to The Heritage Foundation and economist Gary Burtless:
… the comparable policy was shown to reduce yearly hours worked among recipients significantly.
For each $1,000 in added benefits, there was an average $660 reduction in earnings, meaning that $3,000 in government benefits was required for a net increase of $1,000 in family income.
Ah, but we misplace the facts, say UBI’s drummers.
A new reality has fallen over the American economy…
Globalization has removed millions of American jobs.
And these jobs are not coming back, despite Trump’s contrary gloats.
Besides, we are on the verge of dramatic breakthroughs in automation and artificial intelligence (AI).
Many experts estimate these great thieves of human labor will rob 20–40 million American jobs by 2030.
How will these millions of displaced Americans keep body and soul together… if not for the dole?
They further argue that a universal basic income will force the Walmarts of the world to increase their slave-level wages.
Turn to our previous example…
If they paid our couch-bound General Hospital enthusiast $15 per hour instead of $9… she might rise to the bait.
Maybe she would.
But what if her labor is only worth $9?
Will Walmart willingly absorb the loss?
And what about the more productive employee whose labor Walmart previously valued at $15 per hour?
If the bottom rung of the ladder now fetches $15… this worker will demand a commensurate jump to, say, $20.
Then the $20 employee must demand $25 to keep ahead — or $30.
On it goes.
And the company’s slender profit margins are soon devoured by artificially imposed labor costs.
But a giant like Walmart has the wherewithal to absorb the added costs, thunders the UBI caroler.
They’ll survive just fine.
And they may.
But only by sending along those added labor costs to their customers.
And Walmart’s “everyday low prices” would soon become a cruel jest.
Many of their employee’s monetary gains would vanish into the cash register.
Besides, what about the non-Walmarts of this world that cannot absorb the costs?
Here we speak of costs…
We mentioned UBI’s record at the state level.
But what of its likely impact upon the national fisc?
The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities:
There are over 300 million Americans today. Suppose UBI provided everyone with $10,000 a year. That would cost more than $3 trillion a year — and $30–40 trillion over 10 years.
This single-year figure equals more than three-fourths of the entire yearly federal budget — and double the entire budget outside Social Security, Medicare, defense and interest payments. It’s also equal to close to 100% of all tax revenue the federal government collects.
Is greater spending the solution to America’s wobbled finances?
In case of another recession — count on it — demands for universal basic income will leap from low rumble to loud roar.
Which would demand plunging the nation deeper into debt… with less tax revenue to make the shortage good.
The idea of universal basic income is not new.
Pamphleteer Thomas Paine was the first to propose a version of UBI in the 19th century.
We’re just not sure it’s Common Sense…